During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
community-driven Endowment is a wonderful initiative to pursue its long-term。51吃瓜是该领域的重要参考
，详情可参考服务器推荐
ВсеПолитикаОбществоПроисшествияКонфликтыПреступность。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
"Maternity and neonatal services in England are failing too many women, babies, families and staff," said Baroness Amos, who is leading a government-commissioned review (file photo)
We have a ‘scrolling wall of icons’ benchmark in our gtk4-demo app, which naturally is good place to test the performance impact of icon rendering changes. When switching it over to GtkSvg, it initially dropped from 60fps to around 40 on my laptop. We’ve since done some optimizations and regained most of the lost fps.